PinLabelPinLabel
Home / Knowledge Base / Food & Beverage / Infant Formula Labelling and the BMS Marketing Code of Ethics (Malaysia)

Infant Formula Labelling and the BMS Marketing Code of Ethics (Malaysia)

Food & Beverage · 2026-07-11 · PinLabel 合規團隊
Infant Formula Labelling and the BMS Marketing Code of Ethics (Malaysia)

Infant formula (breast-milk substitute, BMS) is one of the most tightly regulated foods in Malaysia. Besides meeting the Food Regulations 1985 requirements for "prescribed food" labelling, its marketing is also strictly governed by the Ministry of Health's Code of Ethics for the Marketing of Infant Foods. In other words, getting the label right is only the pass mark; if the marketing copy and channel practices cross the line, trouble follows all the same. This article explains, in one place, the labelling essentials and the marketing red lines. (For the food labelling overview, see the Complete Guide to Malaysia Food Labelling Regulations.)

Why is infant formula so tightly regulated?

Infants cannot choose for themselves, and formula milk is directly linked to the nutrition and health of infants and young children; internationally there is a long-standing call to "protect, promote and support breastfeeding", so countries set a higher bar on the marketing of breast-milk substitutes than for ordinary food. Malaysia's approach is to regulate on two tracks — "labelling" and "marketing": labelling follows the Food Regulations 1985, and marketing follows the BMS Code of Ethics.

Labelling requirements (Food Regulations 1985)

Infant formula is a "prescribed food", and its labelling must include:

  • Nutritional composition and correct preparation and use instructions (reconstitution ratio, water temperature, sterilisation of utensils, etc.).
  • A breast-milk priority statement: clearly conveying that breast milk is the best food for infants.
  • Compliance with the regulations' specific requirements for infant formula (such as applicable age in months, precautions, etc.).

Because infant formula is a prescribed food, it usually also triggers full nutrition labelling obligations, and the two must be reviewed together. Moreover, the preparation instructions are meant not merely to "teach reconstitution" but to ensure consumers can use the product safely and correctly: a wrong ratio can lead to insufficient or over-concentrated nutrition, and improper water temperature or sterilisation carries a hygiene risk. These instructions are therefore regarded as necessary information directly related to safety, and cannot be put only in fine print or omitted.

Marketing red lines (BMS Code of Ethics)

The Code of Ethics for the Marketing of Infant Foods has been in force since 1979, corresponds to the WHO/ICIFI code, and is administered by the MOH Nutrition Division. Its core prohibitions include:

  • No promotion or advertising to the general public of breast-milk substitutes, feeding bottles and teats.
  • No free samples to be provided to pregnant women, new mothers or their families.
  • No disparaging of breast milk, or use of images or text to imply that formula can replace or is superior to breast milk.
  • Healthcare facilities and personnel must not promote BMS (including distributing samples on their behalf, endorsements, etc.).

The common spirit of these prohibitions is to cut off every channel that would "promote formula milk as an ordinary consumer product". Any seemingly neutral promotion, free sampling or discount, if aimed at consumers, almost always crosses the line.

"Follow-up formula" is also regulated

Do not assume only 0-year infant formula is regulated. Follow-up formula and related products are equally bound by the code, and in marketing likewise cannot be promoted to the public or implied to be superior to breast milk. If the product packaging or copy wants to emphasise any nutritional benefit, take care with the boundaries of food nutrition and health claims, so as not to turn a "claim" into disguised promotion.

Common mistakes

  • Running promotions, free sampling, buy-one-get-one or discount activities to consumers.
  • Packaging or advertising using baby images or text to imply the formula is superior to or equivalent to breast milk.
  • Using "follow-up formula" or a sub-brand to evade the code, doing cross-brand marketing.
  • Distributing samples or obtaining named endorsements through healthcare channels.
  • Attending only to label compliance while ignoring the code risk on the marketing side.

Pre-market self-check checklist

  • [ ] The label includes nutritional composition, preparation and use instructions, and a breast-milk priority statement
  • [ ] It meets the regulations' specific requirements for infant formula
  • [ ] No promotion or advertising of BMS, feeding bottles or teats to the general public
  • [ ] No free samples provided to pregnant women, mothers or families
  • [ ] Packaging/copy does not disparage breast milk or imply it can be replaced
  • [ ] Follow-up formula and related products likewise comply with the code

Frequently asked questions (FAQ)

Q: Is the BMS Code of Ethics mandatory? The code itself is voluntary, but the relevant labelling requirements have been incorporated into the Food Regulations 1985; breaching the marketing rules still carries reputational and regulatory risk, and the authorities continue to review and strengthen it, so it should not be taken lightly.

Q: Is follow-up formula also regulated? Yes. Follow-up formula and related products are equally bound by the code, and the marketing restrictions are the same as for infant formula.

Q: Can I promote it on my own website or social media? Not advisable. The code prohibits promotion or advertising to the general public, and online channels are likewise public-facing marketing channels.

Q: Are there additional requirements for importing infant formula? Yes. Infant formula is a food for special dietary uses and must first obtain FSQD written approval before import — see the food import process.

Conclusion

Infant formula in Malaysia is regulated on two strict tracks: the labelling requirements of the Food Regulations 1985 + the marketing red lines of the BMS Code of Ethics (no promotion, no free samples, no disparaging breast milk). Label and copy must be checked together, so you don't get the label right yet come to grief on the marketing. Want to confirm whether your labelling and copy cross the line? Run a free label check now.

This article is compiled from official regulations and is for reference only; actual compliance is subject to the latest official text and review by the competent authority.

📚 Sources / official references

  1. Food Regulations 1985(P.U.(A) 437/85)全文 — FAO FAOLEX
  2. MOH 營養組 — 嬰兒食品行銷道德準則(Code of Ethics for the Marketing of Infant Foods)
  3. FSQD 食品安全與品質組(衛生部)

This article is compiled from the official sources above for reference only; actual compliance is subject to the authorities' latest regulations and review.

Find out what your label is missing

Free label check →